Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky

9.00

Dear Reader, we are a catalog store that contains links to external resources, such as Amazon. Some of these links are affiliate links. This means that we will receive a small commission from your purchase on that resource, provided you complete the purchase within 24 hours of clicking the link. This will not cost you anything extra, but it will greatly support our project. Thanks for that.

 

Free Russian Books List

Analysis of Works by Russian Writers

Interesting Facts about Russian Writers

Login to Wishlist

Description

Notes from Underground is a philosophical novella told as the rambling, contradictory confession of an unnamed narrator, a retired civil servant living in voluntary isolation in a miserable room on the outskirts of St. Petersburg. This narrator, often called the “Underground Man,” is a bitter, hyper-conscious, and self-loathing individual.

The first part, titled “Underground,” is a dense monologue in which the narrator dissects his own tormented psyche and launches a furious intellectual attack against the dominant European philosophies of the 1860s—namely, rational egoism, utilitarianism, and utopian socialism (epitomized by the “Crystal Palace”). The Underground Man argues vehemently that human nature is fundamentally irrational, perverse, and cannot be confined by any logical system, asserting that man will always choose suffering and chaos simply to prove his own free will.

The second part, “À Propos of the Wet Snow,” details key episodes from the narrator’s past, illustrating his theories in action. These include his humiliating attempts to assert himself among former school acquaintances, his desperate pursuit of a duel with an officer who insulted him, and his disastrous, cruel encounter with a young prostitute named Liza.

Through these events, the narrator reveals the paralyzing gulf between his heightened self-awareness and his inability to act in the real world. The work is a foundational text of existentialism, exploring themes of alienation, psychological torment, and the catastrophic consequences of intellectual pride divorced from compassion.

Browse the table of contents, check the quotes, read the first chapter, find out which famous book it is similar to, and buy “Notes from Underground” on Amazon directly from our page.

Additional information

Genre

Literary Fiction

Lenght

Less 200 Pages

Shop by

In stock

Written Year

Before 1917

Status

Classic

Form

Fiction

Theme

Madness

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAQs

Is the book only available for purchase on Amazon?
Yes, we sell books from there.
What famous book is this similar to?
Albert Camus' The Stranger. Both works feature an anti-hero who is intensely alienated and disconnected from society, delivering a powerful, defiant monologue that challenges conventional morality and rationalism, making him a foundational figure in existential literature.

The Underground

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

VIII

IX

X

XI

A Propos of the Wet Snow

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

VIII

IX

X

It was not only that I could not become spiteful, I did not know how to become anything; neither spiteful nor kind, neither a rascal nor an honest man, neither a hero nor an insect.

The whole work of man really seems to consist in nothing but proving to himself every minute that he is a man and not a piano-key.

Shower upon him every earthly blessing, drown him in a sea of happiness… and even then out of sheer ingratitude, sheer spite, man would play you some nasty trick.

And yet I think man will never renounce real suffering, that is, destruction and chaos. Why, suffering is the sole origin of consciousness.

I

I am a sick man…. I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man. I believe my liver is diseased. However, I know nothing at all about my disease, and do not know for certain what ails me. I don’t consult a doctor for it, and never have, though I have a respect for medicine and doctors. Besides, I am extremely superstitious, sufficiently so to respect medicine, anyway (I am well-educated enough not to be superstitious, but I am superstitious). No, I refuse to consult a doctor from spite. That you probably will not understand. Well, I understand it, though. Of course, I can’t explain who it is precisely that I am mortifying in this case by my spite: I am perfectly well aware that I cannot “pay out” the doctors by not consulting them; I know better than anyone that by all this I am only injuring myself and no one else. But still, if I don’t consult a doctor it is from spite. My liver is bad, well—let it get worse!

I have been going on like that for a long time—twenty years. Now I am forty. I used to be in the government service, but am no longer. I was a spiteful official. I was rude and took pleasure in being so. I did not take bribes, you see, so I was bound to find a recompense in that, at least. (A poor jest, but I will not scratch it out. I wrote it thinking it would sound very witty; but now that I have seen myself that I only wanted to show off in a despicable way, I will not scratch it out on purpose!)

When petitioners used to come for information to the table at which I sat, I used to grind my teeth at them, and felt intense enjoyment when I succeeded in making anybody unhappy. I almost did succeed. For the most part they were all timid people—of course, they were petitioners. But of the uppish ones there was one officer in particular I could not endure. He simply would not be humble, and clanked his sword in a disgusting way. I carried on a feud with him for eighteen months over that sword. At last I got the better of him. He left off clanking it. That happened in my youth, though.

But do you know, gentlemen, what was the chief point about my spite? Why, the whole point, the real sting of it lay in the fact that continually, even in the moment of the acutest spleen, I was inwardly conscious with shame that I was not only not a spiteful but not even an embittered man, that I was simply scaring sparrows at random and amusing myself by it. I might foam at the mouth, but bring me a doll to play with, give me a cup of tea with sugar in it, and maybe I should be appeased. I might even be genuinely touched, though probably I should grind my teeth at myself afterwards and lie awake at night with shame for months after. That was my way.

I was lying when I said just now that I was a spiteful official. I was lying from spite. I was simply amusing myself with the petitioners and with the officer, and in reality I never could become spiteful. I was conscious every moment in myself of many, very many elements absolutely opposite to that. I felt them positively swarming in me, these opposite elements. I knew that they had been swarming in me all my life and craving some outlet from me, but I would not let them, would not let them, purposely would not let them come out. They tormented me till I was ashamed: they drove me to convulsions and—sickened me, at last, how they sickened me! Now, are not you fancying, gentlemen, that I am expressing remorse for something now, that I am asking your forgiveness for something? I am sure you are fancying that … However, I assure you I do not care if you are….

It was not only that I could not become spiteful, I did not know how to become anything; neither spiteful nor kind, neither a rascal nor an honest man, neither a hero nor an insect. Now, I am living out my life in my corner, taunting myself with the spiteful and useless consolation that an intelligent man cannot become anything seriously, and it is only the fool who becomes anything. Yes, a man in the nineteenth century must and morally ought to be pre-eminently a characterless creature; a man of character, an active man is pre-eminently a limited creature. That is my conviction of forty years. I am forty years old now, and you know forty years is a whole lifetime; you know it is extreme old age. To live longer than forty years is bad manners, is vulgar, immoral. Who does live beyond forty? Answer that, sincerely and honestly I will tell you who do: fools and worthless fellows. I tell all old men that to their face, all these venerable old men, all these silver-haired and reverend seniors! I tell the whole world that to its face! I have a right to say so, for I shall go on living to sixty myself. To seventy! To eighty! … Stay, let me take breath …

You imagine no doubt, gentlemen, that I want to amuse you. You are mistaken in that, too. I am by no means such a mirthful person as you imagine, or as you may imagine; however, irritated by all this babble (and I feel that you are irritated) you think fit to ask me who I am—then my answer is, I am a collegiate assessor. I was in the service that I might have something to eat (and solely for that reason), and when last year a distant relation left me six thousand roubles in his will I immediately retired from the service and settled down in my corner. I used to live in this corner before, but now I have settled down in it. My room is a wretched, horrid one in the outskirts of the town. My servant is an old country-woman, ill-natured from stupidity, and, moreover, there is always a nasty smell about her. I am told that the Petersburg climate is bad for me, and that with my small means it is very expensive to live in Petersburg. I know all that better than all these sage and experienced counsellors and monitors…. But I am remaining in Petersburg; I am not going away from Petersburg! I am not going away because … ech! Why, it is absolutely no matter whether I am going away or not going away.

But what can a decent man speak of with most pleasure?

Answer: Of himself.

Well, so I will talk about myself.

Delivery

We do not manage the fulfillment process; we act solely as an intermediary. The item is shipped directly by Amazon.